Internal documents question EPA justification for Pruitt’s security spending
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images(WASHINGTON) — Top Democratic senators are calling for immediate hearings on Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt’s expensive security bill, according to a letter sent to the chairman of the committee that has oversight of the agency.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., and Ranking Member Tom Carper, D-Del., wrote in their letter that an EPA whistleblower has provided documents questioning the agency’s justification for spending more on Pruitt’s 24-7 security detail than on protection for previous administrators.
The senators said they have reviewed documents that say the U.S. Secret Service found no “behaviors of interest” against Pruitt – indicating there was not a credible threat against him.
And, they wrote, an internal EPA report they reviewed indicates “EPA intelligence has not identified any specific credible direct threat to the EPA administrator.” A separate memo from the EPA’s homeland security office in February found that the security team’s justification for increased security spending exaggerated threats against Pruitt to justify first class flights. That memo says the intelligence office at EPA repeatedly told EPA senior leadership and the inspector general’s office that the threat to the administrator was being mischaracterized by his protective detail.
“It is hard to reconcile the public statements of EPA, and the President, with these internal and external assessments,” Whitehouse wrote.
The EPA’s Office of Homeland Security helps the agency plan and respond to security-related incidents, according to its website, which includes proving intelligence on threats and other national security matters that impact EPA programs and coordinating with other federal agencies.
The chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee who received the letter, Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., said in a statement he does not plan to hold hearings on the issue.
“They released information that should not have been released. They selectively chose information,” Barrasso told ABC News on Tuesday. I”t’s why we are not going to have hearings that they have suggested. They’ve really gone way beyond what should be done in terms of sensitive documents related to security of a cabinet official.”
The EPA has said that Pruitt has faced a torrent of threats during his tenure citing a threat assessment from the inspector general that found that there have been more threats and some serious threats against Pruitt than previous administrators.
“Scott Pruitt has faced an unprecedented amount of death threats against him,” EPA spokesman Jahan Wilcox said in an email Tuesday, saying that threats are assessed by EPA’s enforcement and homeland security offices as well as the protective detail.
“Americans should all agree that members of the President’s cabinet should be kept safe from these violent threats,” he said in the statement.
The EPA’s inspector general has been looking into the cost of Pruitt’s 24-7 security detail and whether the agency followed all agency rules in assigning the detail. That report is expected to be published this summer. The inspector general’s office evaluates threats against the administrator and other EPA employees but does not make day-to-day decisions about how they should be protected.
The senators’ letter says that the IG evaluated 16 threats, a 400 percent increase from threats directed and former Administrator Gina McCarthy. The letter includes examples of those threats including protesters who attempted to disrupt a speech, a social media post expressing displeasure at Pruitt’s policies and a postcard sent to the administrator that said “Climate change is real!! We are watching you.”
“A closer look at the description of many of these threats cast doubt that they appropriately justify the kinds of security measures Mr. Pruitt has sought,” they wrote.
The letter also says that none of the incidents in the internal documents concerned air travel and that the only threat being prosecuted was directed at both Pruitt and McCarthy.
The EPA has said that Pruitt often flies first class because it was recommended by his security team, saying that the agency grants him a waiver to fly an upgraded class every time because of the security threats. According to the letter, the February memo from EPA’s Office of Homeland Security Office found that the justification for those first-class flights “mischaracterized” threats and that EPA intelligence has “not seen any analysis to indicate why the Administrator would be at any greater risk on a commercial airline than any other passenger.”
Pruitt said in an interview with Fox News last week that his security detail wanted him to fly in first class so that he could be evacuated more quickly if there was a problem. He told CBS News last month that he has directed his staff to find a new approach that would involve more flights in coach.
EPA documents obtained by E&E News found that the EPA spent more than $830,000 on payroll and travel for Pruitt’s security detail in his first four months in office, compared to about $465,000 for McCarthy’s detail in her first few months.
The EPA also spent around $43,000 to install a “secure phone booth” in Pruitt’s office and has swept his office for bugs and installed biometric locks on his office. The Government Accountability Office, known as the congressional watchdog, is looking into the cost of the phone booth.
Whitehouse has also asked for more information about the contract to sweep Pruitt’s office for bugs because the company that was hired to do the sweep was connected to the head of Pruitt’s security detail.
President Donald Trump tweeted last weekend that Pruitt has received “death threats” that justify his increased security spending.
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders was also asked Monday about the nature of the threats and said there was a “much larger number of security issues” surrounding Pruitt than previous administrators. The White House has initiated a formal review into issues surrounding Pruitt since reports that he rented a room in a Capitol Hill townhouse connected to lobbyists in his first six months in Washington.
Barrasso said in a statement Monday that he is waiting for the outcome of the White House review.
Copyright © 2018, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.