Republicans propose an amendment that would bar Department of Defense from funding transgender medical surgeries


Posted on: July 13th, 2017 by ABC News No Comments

John Woodworth / robertharding / Getty Images(WASHINGTON) — Democrats were enraged Thursday by an amendment to the defense authorization bill that would prohibit the Department of Defense from using any government money to provide medical treatment related to gender transition.

The amendment, which was offered by Republican Rep. Vicky Hartzler of Missouri, bans money available to the Department of Defense from being used to provide medical treatment, other than mental health treatment, related to gender transition to DoD personnel.

Hartzler says her amendment is intended to prevent the military from paying for transgender surgeries but explains that her motive is “to ensure that our military is the most effective, efficient and well-funded fighting force in the world.”

“With the challenges we are facing across the globe, we are asking the American people to invest their hard-earned money in national defense. Each dollar needs to be spent to address threats facing us,” Hartzler wrote in a statement. “My amendment ends the 2016 Obama Administration practice of the military paying for very expensive gender change surgeries that even most private insurance plans don’t cover.”

The amendment could face a vote by the full House of Representatives late Thursday, alarming House Democrats.

Rep. Mark Takano, a California Democrat, spoke out against the amendment, calling it “truly ugly.”

Rep. Joe Kennedy III, D-Massachusetts, noted the greater implications of the amendment. “Bigotry is the last thing this country should offer any brave man or woman who volunteers to defend us,” Kennedy, who serves as chairman of the Congressional Transgender Equality Task Force, said in a statement.

“By inserting Congress into the personal medical decisions of certain service members, this amendment tells thousands of Americans willing to pay the ultimate sacrifice that they are not entitled to the same rights as the soldier they stand next to. Transgender Americans, in uniform or not, deserve better than this hateful amendment from those elected to represent them.”

Hartzler says her amendment doesn’t prevent anyone from joining the military or receiving standard medical care but “simply makes sure our defense resources are allocated in a way that is smart and good for our national defense.”

“This current policy of providing and paying for transgender surgeries hurts readiness and is projected to cost over a billion dollars over the next ten years,” she added.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., declined to say whether he supports the amendment but said it’s “important” Congress “work closely” with the Department of Defense on the issue.

“As you probably know, Secretary Mattis is under review on this right now, and so I want to make sure that what we do is in close coordination with them,” Ryan said off Secretary of Defense Mike Mattis.

Mattis last month approved a recommendation by the military services to delay the accession of transgender applications into the military until Jan. 1, 2018. That decision had no effect on existing policy that allows service members to transition using the department’s health care coverage.

A statement at the time of the secretary’s decision asserted that the six-month delay would allow for the military services to evaluate how a change would affect military readiness.

“We’ll see what happens with the Hartzler amendment,” Ryan continued. “It’s an open process. She can bring an amendment to the floor if she wants to.”

House Democrats are not the only ones to express concern over the bill: The American Civil Liberties Union is writing lawmakers, urging a vote against the amendment.

“The Hartzler Amendment is specifically designed to discriminate against transgender members of the Armed Forces and their families,” Ian Thompson, legislative representative for the ACLU, stated.

“By barring them from receiving medically necessary health care, this amendment would put the health of members of our military and their families at risk by undermining the ability of military doctors to provide care for their patients.”

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.