Donnelly Helps Introduce Legislation that would Overturn Expansion of short-term Insurance Plans
U.S. Senator Joe Donnelly helped introduce legislation that would overturn the Administration’s recently finalized rule about short-term “junk” insurance plans.
Donnelly said, “The Administration’s efforts to expand ‘junk’ plans – which are likely to raise costs for consumers without covering those with pre-existing conditions – are misguided. The legislation I helped introduce would overturn this bad rule, and help stop the Administration’s ongoing efforts to undermine our health care system.”
The new rule on short-term health plans will allow consumers to buy so-called “junk” plans for up to 364 days at time, reversing the current limitation that these plans can only be used for three months at a time as a bridge option for consumers. These plans, sold outside of the current health insurance exchanges, including in Indiana, allow insurers to deny coverage for those with pre-existing conditions. Short-term “junk” plans are scheduled to become available in two months, and could further harm the individual marketplace when open enrollment begins for consumers this fall. These plans will allow insurers to charge more when consumers are sick and higher rates for older Hoosiers. In addition, these plans are not required to cover essential health care benefits including emergency services, mental health care, prescription drugs, and preventative care. The “junk” plans can be renewed for a maximum of up to three years, though insurers could choose not to allow consumers to extend coverage if someone gets sick or is diagnosed with cancer or another disease, for example. 21 patient groups sent a letter to the Departments of Labor, Treasury, and Health and Human Services opposing the short-term plan rule, writing “we are deeply concerned about the impact the proposed rule on short-term plans will have on the individuals and families we represent.” These groups include the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. In addition, 98% of health care groups who commented on the proposed rule were in opposition.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.